Do you
know what is called an obsession with one topic? It’s a situation when ten out
of ten “major” news of financially oriented press agency Reuters providing
online data from the financial markets has in its title the word “Trump”.
So it is pretty obvious with what is “officially” being the movement of almost
any exchange rate, stock or yield explained even if it had absolutely nothing
to do with America or Donald Trump. But let’s look at the current financial
events without emotions.
Especially today is being ruled by the drop of the vast majority of the
European stock markets (we can’t judge the American ones just yet). Many of
them are getting to their weakest values in this year. The reason? We have been
talking about it last week already: Trump started his days in the office with
comments that are clearly pointing at the intentions to issue protectionism in
the foreign trade. Even though some individuals can think about the profits and
losses of such attitude whatever they want the financial markets as a whole are
clear about the matter: They perceive any protectionism always completely
negative.
You surely remember the prognosis that if Trump wins the presidential
elections the stocks will sharply drop – which got confirmed in the end for a
few hours so the belief that he “surely didn’t mean it seriously with the
protectionism and it was only pre-election talks” would prevail afterwards. And
as a reaction to that, the drop of the stocks turned into growth. And now
almost like retrospectively the scenario which was expected right after the
election started only additionally coming true: When the opinion that in the
question of protectionism it wasn’t only the pre-election rhetoric started
prevailing in the end, the stocks started reacting to that, how it was
predicted that they will react right after the elections.
When we look at it with bystander’s eyes we can’t not notice really strange
phenomenon: The stocks and the dollar were not long ago relatively sharply
rising because of the assumption that Trump will wake economic growth in the
USA. Now both are dropping because of the assumption that Trump will establish
protectionism and cools down the global economic growth that way. To be honest
neither of those assumptions have much support in facts or arguments – the Trump card is
overrated.
One human with strong opposition in Congress on top of that can
hardly wake up the economy to such dramatic growth just like one human can
hardly take the economy radically down – not to mention that the theoretical
economics know that the monetary politics of the central bank has much bigger
and faster effect on development of GDP than the fiscal politics of the
government. So the financial markets are overreacting on both sides – however
overreacting has been always typical for them. The golden middle road would
most likely better match the real judgment of the situation.
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat